Welcome to the AAC ToolKit, compiled by me: Hanna Bogen! This is an evolving ToolKit of AAC resources (most of which were not developed by me) for children and adult clients who currently use or are being evaluated to use AAC! Stay posted for continual updates! Each post is a resource that can be used for either children, adults, or all AAC users!

In case you're wondering how to use this site most effectively, here are a couple pointers! Just below this "blurb" and to the right is a section called Types of Resources. This is a general categorization of the posts/tools into populations: adults, children and young adults, and all AAC users (both adults and children) and eval/assessment vs. intervention tools. You can click each of those general categories to find specific posts/tools that relate to those categories. Below that area is the Blog Archive, a list of all posts/tools on this site, in case you'd rather navigate through the resources in that way!
Showing posts with label Tools for All AAC Users. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tools for All AAC Users. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

List of Language and Literacy Tests for Individuals using AAC


Resource Toolkit Assignment:  Resource Summary Sheet

1.     Name of the tool, or a brief description: List of Language and Literacy Tests for Individuals Using AAC

2.     What type of patient(s) would you use this tool/technique with?  (Describe by characteristics or by etiology.) This resource is intended to be used by the speech-language pathologist when determining what kinds of literacy and language assessments to use with a client during an AAC assessment. Since this includes both adult and pediatric-appropriate tests, the target client population is quite diverse.

3.     How/why would you use this tool?  In what way will it be helpful? I would use this resource when choosing an appropriate formal assessment tool for a pediatric or adult client. It’s critical that I (or any SLP) know the tests well enough to be able to determine which are normed for children and which are normed for adults. Testing the language and literacy abilities of a client is critical in determining the type of communicator they are and how to effectively program their device.

4.     What are the advantages of this tool/technique? This list is extremely well-organized by what is actually being tests. I also like that the tests are in alphabetical order.

5.     Are there any disadvantages to this tool/technique? I wish this tool were further organized by normed ages for each tests (so you would very quickly know which tests are appropriate for various client populations).

The next several questions relate to how you obtained this resource:
6.     If you used an existing tool, answer these two questions:
a)    Source/citation for this tool:   (whether published, or from a course, or SPHSC materials) This resource came from Dr. Dowden’s catalyst class page (which can only be accessed by current UW SLP graduate students).

b)    Did you modify this tool?  If so, in what way? No, I did not modify this tool.

c)     Anything you still don’t like about it and may change in the future? I would consider further organizing this list by normed age for each test!







List of Language and Literacy Tests for Individuals using AAC
Created by Dr. Pat Dowden

Assumptions:
1.    The common characteristic of these tests is that they can be administered (in whole or in part) to individuals who cannot speak but can select pictures/icons/text.
2.    Tests should be selected carefully based on the purpose of the testing as well as the target population, age and normative information on the test.
3.    The tests below test a wide range of abilities, from very simple to highly complex skills
4.    Whenever possible, standardized tests are preferred over non-standardized tests
5.    Whenever possible, standardized administration procedures should be used.
6.    If modifications have to be made, this must be stated when reporting the use of the test.
7.    One must not use a picture pointing test to assess an individual who is unreliable at pointing to pictures (whom I call “emerging” communicators).  This produces only unreliable information.

Tests of receptive language(Notice, these are in alphabetical order)
Receptive vocabulary:
1.    Battelle Developmental Inventories (Newborg et al., 1984)
2.    Boston Aphasia Examination (BAE)
3.    Bracken Basic Concept Scale – Revised (Bracken, 1998)
4.    Clinical Assessment of Language Comprehension (Miller & Paul, 1995)
5.    Clinical Evaluation of Lang. Fundamentals (CELF).  Selected subtests only.
6.    Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS) (Wetherby & Prizant, 1993)
7.    MacArthur Communication Development Inventories (Fenson et al., 1993)  This is parent report; what are the challenges?  Research has found high correlations between parent report and experimental probes
8.    OWLS:  Listening Comprehension Scale.  Can the results be parsed for knowledge of syntax?
9.    PLS:  Preschool Language Scale-4  or PLS-5.  Some portions of Auditory Comprehension testing.
10.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT)  (Dunn & Dunn, 1997)   One of the most commonly used tests
11.Receptive One-Word Vocabulary Test (ROWVT).  This may not be not as informative as the PPVT; Ceiling may be low.
12.Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development (Hedrick, Prather, & Tobin, 1984)
13.Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language (TACL)   Vocabulary subtest
14.Test of Language Development (TOLD)
15.Western Aphasia Battery (WAB)   Only portions of this test can be used.
Receptive syntax & morphology:
1.    Assessment of Children’s Language Comprehension (ACLC)   Very old test; tests from field of 3 pictures
2.    Auditory Comprehension of Language – Third Edition (Carrow-Woolfolk, 1999)
3.    Clinical Evaluation of Lang. Fundamentals (CELF) (Semel, Wiig, & Secord, 2003)  Selected subtests only.
4.    Test of Auditory Comprehension of Lang. (TACL).  Very old test, tests understanding of morphology & grammaticality judgment
5.    Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) (Rice-Wexler) Early grammaticality judgment; for 4-9 years of age.  Child responds “right” or “not so good” by speech or pointing
6.    Test of Language Development (Hammill & Newcomer, 1996)
7.    Test for Reception of Grammar – Version 2 (Bishop, 2003)

Tests of Expressive languageThese are difficult to use well with AAC users because they may have no speech, or severely unintelligible speech, and/or limited vocabulary in a communication system and/or limited knowledge about accessing/finding that vocabulary for testing purposes.  However, testing may be possible if an individual speaks and that severely unintelligible speech becomes “comprehensible” to you in a narrow context.  You may be able to understand a correct answer from the child when the options are few.  Be careful using this method, however, because you may not recognize synonyms that would be equally correct, and you typically cannot test complex language this way.  But, to this end, you might be able to use:
1.    Expressive One-Word Vocabulary Test (ROWVT)
2.    Expressive Vocabulary Test (EVT)
Tests of Reading: (in alphabetical order)
Excellent online resource:  http://www.sedl.org/reading/rad/
1.    Analytic Reading Inventory (ARI).  Pointing to words, given sound of word; not for early readers
2.    Accessible Word Reading Intervention (AWRI) This is an intervention protocol but may have formal testing included. Software available for free from http://www.elr.com.au/apar
3.    CELF-Preschool 2:  Pre-Literacy Rating Scale.  Very early skills in emergent reading and writing
4.    Concepts about Print Test (Clay, 1979).  Preschool, e.g. orientation to page
5.    Concept of Word Test (Clay, 1979).  Elementary age vocabulary
6.    Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS).  Preschool, pointing to pictures
7.    Gates MacGinitie Reading Test – 4th Edition (MacGinitie, MacGinitie, Maria, & Dreyer, 2000)  Variety of levels, Usually pointing or marking correct answer
8.    Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE) (Williams, 2001)
9.    Peabody Individual Achievement Test – Revised – Normative Update (PIAT) (Markwardt, 1998)
10.Test of Early Reading Ability (TERA).  Normed to below 4 years
11.Test of Reading Comprehension – Third Edition (Brown et al., 1995)
12.Woodcock- Johnson III (Woodcock et al., 2001)  selected subtests

Tests of Spelling: (in alphabetical order)
1.    Developmental Spelling Test (Morris & Perney, 1984)  (dictation)
2.    Spelling Performance Evaluation for Language and Literacy (SPELL; Masterson et al., 2002).  (CD-ROM based, criterion referenced, prescriptive spelling assessment)
3.    Test of Written Spelling-4  (dictation)
4.    Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)  (dictation)
Important clinical note:  If the individual does well on spelling to dictation, you will need to test them again without an auditory model.  There are no tests that do this formally, but I’ve used the following informally:
5.    Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT). Type/spell some words shown only picture
6.    EOWVT or EVT:  Type/spell words shown only picture

Tests/Measures of Phonological Awareness: (These include informal tasks, again in alphabetical order)
1.    Phonological Awareness Test (PAT) 2nd edition.  Particularly the Invented Spelling Subtest
Robertson & Salter, 2007
2.    Assessment of Language & Literacy (ALL).  Lombardino, Lieberman & Brown (2005)
Several useful subtests; particularly interesting is the Inventing Spelling Subtest. 
3.    Emerging Literacy & Language Assessment by Wiig & Secord (2006)   Ages 4-6, 9 – 11; most of the test is reported to be useful.   
4.    Assessment of Phonological Awareness and Reading  (APAR). Software available for free from http://www.elr.com.au/apar. The test was “…created to avoid spoken responses, … that could be administered to individuals despite their methods of communication”.
5.    Brigance:  “Basic Skills”  (I don’t have details on this yet.)
6.    C-TOPP:  Which version? Which subtest(s)?   (How would you decide)
7.    Rime/Rhyme    (From:  Rvachew et al, AJSLP 12, p. 463-471)
Task:  Listen to the name of the puppet and then look at 4 pictures.  Point to the picture that matched the puppet’s name. 
E.g.  Puppet = “Dan”  Options = car, house, boat, van
Variations:  might name the options for support
8.    Onset Matching:   (From:  Rvachew et al, AJSLP 12, p. 463-471)
Task:  Listen to the name of the puppet and then look at 4 pictures.  Point to the picture that starts with the same sound as his name. 
Example:  Stimulus = “Bill”; Field = hat, mat, bus, truck
Variations:  might name options for support
9.    Phonemic Perception/Discrimination:  (From:  Rvachew et al, AJSLP 12, p. 463-471)
10.Test of Phonological Awareness (Torgesen & Bryant, 1994)
Purpose: Assessing the child’s ability to discriminate between sounds articulated correctly from sounds articulated incorrectly.
Task: Children were to point to the px of the word they heard IF that word was produced correctly.  Example:  lake à “lake” or lake à “wake”
Stimuli:  presented with a px of target word (correct) and a large X (incorrect)

AAC Glossary of Terms


Resource Toolkit Assignment:  Resource Summary Sheet

1.     Name of the tool, or a brief description: The AAC Glossary: a glossary of terms related to augmentative and alternative communication
2.     What type of patient(s) would you use this tool/technique with?  (Describe by characteristics or by etiology.) I would not necessarily provide this tool directly to a patient. Rather, I would use this to inform myself about appropriate terms and vocabulary in the field of AAC in order to best serve my clients and communicate intelligently with other professionals who interact with AAC users.
3.     How/why would you use this tool?  In what way will it be helpful? This tool is a great educational resource for professional who work with AAC users. It allows us to communicate with a common language so we are all working toward the goal of providing the AAC user with the best possible communication options.
4.     What are the advantages of this tool/technique? The glossary provides a shared language for professionals to communicate appropriately about AAC.
5.     Are there any disadvantages to this tool/technique? No

The next several questions relate to how you obtained this resource:
6.     If you used an existing tool, answer these two questions:
a)     Source/citation for this tool:   (whether published, or from a course, or SPHSC materials) This list is from: http://depts.washington.edu/augcomm/00_general/glossary.htm#fringevocabulary
b)    Did you modify this tool?  If so, in what way? I did not make any modifications to the glossary.
c)     Anything you still don’t like about it and may change in the future? I would likely to continually update the list with terms I find myself using regularly when working with AAC clients.




AAC Glossary
From: http://depts.washington.edu/augcomm/00_general/glossary.htm#fringevocabulary

AAC: see Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Abstract symbols: Symbols that do not resemble the referent at all. For example, the peace symbol is a drawing that does not look like "peace" at all. (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Access method (or selection technique): The way in which the user interacts with a device to control it for communication; the method an individual uses to select items for communication, e.g. pointing, single-switch scanning, etc. There are two broad categories of access methods: 1) Direct selection and 2) Indirect Selection (Dowden & Cook, 2002).
ACD: see Augmentative Communication Device
Activation feedback: Some devices have settings that determine what the user hears or sees while composing a message. This feedback is not intended for the communication partner; it serves as a way for the user to check for errors during composition.
Active matrix screen: A computer screen that provides a more responsive image at a wide range of viewing angles (http://whatis.com/activema.htm)
Aided communication: Communication that requires something external to the body to represent meaning, for example pointing to a symbol in a communication notebook (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Aided input: A technique used by the partner to enhance auditory comprehension by the AAC user. The speaking partner uses writing and drawing to supplement the words he or she is speaking, so that the AAC user can better understand. This technique is typically used with adults with receptive language impairments due to aphasia.
Aided techniques: Methods of communication that require something external to the body to represent meaning; for example a book, board or device (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Alphanumeric or numeric encoding: Messages can be stored under combinations of letters and numbers (alphanumeric) or by numbers alone (numeric) (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998). See "Encoding" below.
American Sign Language: A manually coded language used primarily by deaf individuals in North America (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1992)
Auditory fishing: A setting that allows users to browse the items on the display through direct selection by listening to the output at a reduced volume before making a selection (Dowden & Cook, 2002).
Auditory symbols: Selection-set items that are presented in an audible manner, for example through Partner Assisted Auditory Scanning (see below) or Auditory Fishing (above).
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): An area of clinical practice that attempts to compensate (either temporarily or permanently) for the impairment and disability patterns of individuals with severe expressive communication disorders (ASHA, 1989)
Augmentative communication device (ACD): A phrase used by Washington State Department of Social and Health Services to refer to equipment used by any AAC user to aid their communication
British Sign Language: A manually coded language used by the deaf community of Great Britain (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1992)
Coded access: An access method in which the individual uses a sequence of body movements to retrieve items from the selection set. For example, Morse code is a method of coded access that requires a different sequence of finger-tapping movements for each letter of the alphabet. It is possible to use coded access along with other types of encoding. In Morse code, the letters "S" "O" "S" stand for an entire phrase (Save Our Ship); this is an example of encoding. Many people confuse these two uses of the term "code" in our field (Dowden and Cook, 2002)
Communication notebook/board: Two low-tech AAC tools that an individual uses to express personally relevant concepts by pointing to line drawings, words, pictures, numbers, and/or the alphabet. The communication board contains the set of symbols on a flat surface; a communication book or notebook has several pages of symbols.
Context-dependent communication: Communication that is limited to some topics in some contexts or with some partners; the individual is not able to communication with anyone about any topic. Context-dependent communication is more effective than Emerging communication (see below) because it is not limited to the "here and now" or shared knowledge by the partner.
Core vocabulary: Messages and words that are frequently used by many individuals across many contexts. This vocabulary typically consists of "functor" words such as "is, was, he, she" and common nouns and primary verbs (e.g. person, like, want). (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1992)
Deaf World: A culture that shares a common language (American Sign Language), beliefs, customs, arts, history, and folklore. It is primarily comprised of individuals who have prelingual deafness.
Dedicated devices: Originally, this term was used to refer to any device that was designed and manufactured for AAC users. Some devices could run other software (e.g. word processors) or perform other functions (e.g. writing or printing) but they were still "dedicated" to AAC users. In recent years, funding agencies (most notably Medicare and Medicaid) have begun to use the term to mean devices that can only be used for face-to-face communication (such as "Speech Generating Devices") and not for writing or printing. This has resulted in confusion in our field regarding this term. In this course, we use the term "dedicated" to differentiate it from "computer-based systems" that will accept and run Windows or MacIntosh software in addition to the AAC software.
Department of Social & Heath Services (DSHS): A state organization that helps people in need, primarily families with young children and people with physical or mental disabilities, to get food, medical care and other basic needs.
Dependent communicators: Individuals who are unable to communicate about all topics with any listener. They rely on familiar partners to understand their utterances/messages or depend on others to provide them with the necessary vocabulary (Dowden, 1999)
Digitized speech: The computer reproduces messages that have been recorded and stored in digital format (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Direct selection: A method of communication in which the individual specifically indicates the desired item in the selection set without any intermediary steps. There are four types of direction selection methods used for AAC devices/strategies: a) pointing with physical contact and force; b) pointing without physical contact; c) pointing with contact and no force; and d) picking up and exchanging. (Dowden & Cook, 2001) (Note: message retrieval methods are not considered "intermediary steps" here.)
Directed scanning: An access technique that combines elements of direct selection and single-switch scanning. The individual uses a multi-switch array, for example, a joystick or arrow keys, to move the cursor in the desired direction and to make a selection.
DSHS: see Department of Social & Heath Services
Dynamic Displays: A feature of some communication devices that allows the user to change the vocabulary options that he can see. Navigating these displays is a bit like browsing the World Wide Web in that you can move back and forth between the displays with buttons.
Emerging communicator: An individual who does not yet have any reliable means of symbolic communication, although he/she typically has non-symbolic communication (Dowden, 1999). This communication, for example using gestures and facial expressions, can be very useful with highly familiar partners, but it tends to be limited to the "here and now" or rely heavily on the partner's shared knowledge.
Encoding: A rate enhancement technique in which the user selects a predetermined sequence of items to retrieve a complete word, phrase or sentence. Codes can be based on icons (symbols), alphabet letters, letters and numbers combined ("alphanumeric codes") or numbers alone. A sequence of symbols from the selection set calls up the desired word or phrase (Dowden & Cook, 2002)
Enhancement process: Strategies for speeding up communication or making it easier for the AAC user (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Expressive communication refers to how an individual uses symbolic language, whether through speech, sign, writing, or any other modality.
Facilitated Communication (FC): A technique that was popular a few years ago, in which an individual spelled messages via an alphabet board while a facilitator held the individual's arm. While the technique has been largely discredited due to the potential for partner influence, that does not mean that the individual is not capable of more communication through other alternative techniques.
Feature: A prominent characteristic of a communication device or a communication strategy. For example, voice output is a feature of many AAC devices.
Finger spelling/Manual alphabet: A method of communication via spelling that uses hand configurations to represent letters of the alphabet.
Foils: items in a selection set that are not intended to be selected, for example, blank items, objects that are disliked, or items that are not appropriate in a given context. These are used to determine reliability or consistency with the communication technique.
Fringe vocabulary: A vocabulary specific or unique to a AAC user or to one activity or topic (Beukelman &Mirenda, 1998)
Functor words: Usually small words such as of, by, with, etc.
Generative vocabularies: Vocabulary that allows the user to create novel messages (Dowden & Cook, 2002)
Gestural codes: A communication system that is based on movements, like gestures, but the meaning is not obvious from the movement and must be learned. AmerInd, which is based on American Indian sign language, is one such system.
Gesture: An unaided method of communication that includes facial expressions, eye gazing, hand movements and body postures (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998) The meaning does not typically have to be learned, but is clear from the movement itself.
Headwand: A stick held closely to the head (typically mounted on a cap) and used by individuals with poor hand control to perform some tasks otherwise done by hand, such as reaching and pointing. Some AAC users use headwands to select items on a communication display or device.
Icon encoding: visual symbols are combined to store words, phrases or sentences. The icons are usually abstract so that there can be multiple meanings associated with them. Encoding is a speed-enhancement technique.
Ideograph: Symbols that are abstract representations
Independent communication: The ability to communicate with both familiar and unfamiliar partners about any topic in any context (Dowden 1999). "Independent communication" does not mean that the individual does not rely on technology or assistance from people in the environment.
Indirect selection: A method of communication that involves intermediary steps by the device or the partner, usually to compensate for motor limitations of the user. Examples include single-and dual-switch scanning, directed scanning and coded access (Dowden and Cook, 2002).
Individual Education Plan (IEP): A document detailing the educational goals of an individual with disabilities and the special services the individual will receive in order to work toward those goals.
International symbols: Symbols that are understood in many cultures. For example, the picture symbols of men's and ladies' rooms are widely understood.
Key word signing: Signing only the key words in an utterance, sometimes done while speaking (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Less costly alternative: A phrase used by insurance companies and 3rd party payers to refer to equipment or services that are less expensive but may still meet the patient's needs
Letter of justification: The letter by a physician and a clinician to a 3rd party payer (e.g. insurance company) to request funding for an AAC device. See details on UW Augcomm on what such a document should include and how it should be written.
Lexigrams: Symbols originally designed for research purposes, designed by combining nine basic design/meaning elements (Lloyd, Fuller and Arvidson, 1997)
Line drawing: Simple black and white pictures used as symbols for communication, such as Blissymbol and Rebus (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1992)
Linguistic prediction: A method of predicting the next words, based on the grammatical rules of the words that have preceded it (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Limb apraxia: The inability to perform a volitional motor movement of the hands, arms or legs in the absence of paralysis or paresis.
Locked-In Syndrome (LIS): An individual who is truly "locked-in" has no voluntary movement except vertical eye movements and, in some cases, blinking, but the individual is consious. This is typically caused by a basilar artery stroke, tumor or trauma damaging the pons or midbrain. (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Low-tech (or No tech): A popular name for devices, such as books, boards and pictures, that use little or no electronic technology to promote communication. They are in contrast to high technology or computerized devices.
Manual sign language: A formal language in which communicators use visual symbols rather than oral sounds to convey meaning. An example is American Sign Language, which is used by deaf or hearing-impaired individuals.
Medical necessity: A phrase used by insurance companies and 3rd party payers to describe the equipment and services a patient requires for health and safety needs. Insurance companies and 3rd party payers usually only provide equipment and services that meet medical needs, as opposed to educational or social needs.
Message retrieval strategy: Only the smallest devices show all the available vocabulary at once. Devices with a larger capacity only show some vocabulary and require the user to "retrieve" words that are not readily visible at first. An individual who is not able to use a retrieval method, or does not use it proficiently, will be unable to use that additional vocabulary during communication. There are three types of message retrieval strategies: a) Levels and Overlays, b) Dynamic Displays and c) Encoding. (Note: Encoding also funcitons as a rate enhancement method.)
Minspeak: A type of icon encoding (see above) used in devices by one manufacturer: Prentke Romich Company.
Morse code: An international system that uses a series of dots and dashes to represent letters, punctuation and numbers. When an AAC user uses this system, the dots and dashes are more likely to be high or low pitch tones (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1992)
Mouthstick: A wand that is held in the mouth and used by individuals with poor hand control to perform some tasks otherwise done by hand, such as reaching & pointing. Some AAC users use mouthsticks to select items on a communication display or device.
Non-Oral techniques: Methods of communication that do not use the oral structures and functions, such as the aided and unaided techniques described elsewhere.
Non-symbolic communication: Gestures, pointing, vocalizations, intonation, body language and facial expression are examples of non-symbolic communication. It is limited to the "here and now," responding to what one sees, hears or feels in the immediate environment.
Novel utterances: Unique messages that an individual produces to say exactly what is intended at a given moment. They are the opposite of "preprogrammed" messages that must be composed and programmed ahead of time. True independence in AAC necessitates the ability to create and deliver novel utterances.
Occupational Therapist (OT): A professional who provides services related to activities of daily living, work, and play to individuals who want to enhance their independence and their quality of life
Opportunity Barriers: The obstacles imposed by other people, preventing AAC users from full participation. For example, a teacher or SLP may believe that non-speakers cannot learn to spell, so literacy instruction is not provided. Or a school may have a policy that prevents a child from taking a communication device home. (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Oral techniques: Methods of communication that require the use of oral structures and function, for example an electrolarynx or voice amplifier.
Orthographic symbols: Aided techniques, such as Braille and finger spelling, that represent traditional orthography, (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
OT: see Occupational therapist
OT/PT: Either an occupational therapist or a physical therapist
Output: The output is primarily thought of as the method by which information is conveyed to the partner; e.g. visual output or auditory output. Some devices also connect to computers, cell phones and the internet, a type of "electronic" output that is used to control the environment.
Partner influence: When one or more communication partners can affect the selection of messages by a user either consciously or unconsciously. Examples include Facilitated Communication (FC) through a touch of the hand or single-switch scanning through extensive cueing or partner assisted scanning (PAS) through intonation patterns.
Partner assisted AUDITORY scanning: A method of partner assisted scanning (see below) in which the items are named or read aloud to the user.
Partner assisted scanning (PAS): A method of communication involving no technology in which the partner identifies (by naming or pointing) the items in the selection set and waits for the user to signal (via a sound or a movement) the item he/she wishes to communicate. This can be done with one-by-one with items in a linear array (e.g. A,B,C,D....) or via a group-item strategy (e.g. A - G, H - L, etc.) gradually narrowing down the selection. It can also be done with words and phrases rather than letters of the alphabet. For more information on this useful technique, visit the Auditory Scanning and AAC Website or read about "Auditory Scanning" on the Augmentative Communication News Website.
Partner assisted VISUAL scanning: A method of partner assisted scanning (see above) in which the communication partner points sequentially to the items on the display. Typically, people learn to point to each row first. Once the individual signals the correct row, then they point to each item in the row until the individual signals a selection.
PECS: see Picture Exchange Communication System
Physiatrist: A physician who specializes in physical medicine and rehabilitation, focusing on the ability to perform functional activities.
Physical characteristics: The tangible qualities of a device, such as dimensions, weight, and construction materials. These qualities affect the usefulness of a device to a user. For example, a device that is large and bulky may not be portable.
Physical therapist (PT): A professional who helps to restore or improve motor functions in individuals with muscular problems
Pictograph: Symbols that resemble their referents. For example, a pictograph of a horse has a body, a head, four legs and a tail.
Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): A method of communication developed by Pyramid Educational Corporation, in which the communicator picks up one or more symbols and hands them to a partner (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Prediction: A rate enhancement technique in which the device or the communication partner guesses the end of a word or phrase, based on previous selections. There are many types of prediction used in devices, some more sophisticated than others.
Preprogrammed utterances: Messages that are composed and stored ahead of time so they can be delivered in a timely manner. Some are urgent messages (e.g. I need help!) and others are social messages (e.g. "You are exactly right!"). They are the opposite of novel utterances created by the user at the time of communication. An individual cannot obtain true independence in AAC with only access to preprogrammed utterances.
PT: see Physical therapist
Rate enhancement: A technique or strategy used to speed up AAC output because it is so much slower than speech. Most rate enhancements can be grouped into two types: encoding and prediction.
Receptive communication refers to how well an individual understands communication, whether it is speech, sign or writing. It contrasts withexpressive communication.
Reliable communication: means that the individual is able to communicate what he/she intends to communicate, not accidentally push another key or convey a message that was not intended. Reliability is crucial to independence.
Retrieval strategies: In aids with a large vocabulary, there has to be a way to select vocabulary that is not immediately visible to the user. There are three common strategies: levels, dynamic displays, and encoding.
Scanning: An "indirect selection" technique in which items are presented sequentially one at a time and the individual activates a switch or otherwise signals to accept one of the items when presented. Scanning, like other indirect selection techniques, is only intended for individuals who do not have sufficient motor control for direct selection techniques.
Selection set: The items (vocabulary/symbols) available to a specific AAC user for communication. They may be presented in a visual, auditory, or tactile form, depending on the user's needs. (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Selection technique (or access method): The way in which the user interacts with a device to control it for communication, e.g. pointing, single-switch scanning, etc. (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Signed Exact English: A complex system of signing English that uses the grammatical features of prefixes, suffixes and tenses (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1992)
SLP: Abbreviation for Speech-Language Pathologist
Speech Supplementation Strategies: These are approaches for making the speech more understandable (or "comprehensible") to the partner even if the actual intelligibility of the speech itself does not change. These techniques include first letter cueing with fingerspelling or an alphabet board, setting the context with a context board, etc. For further information, see Dowden (1997).
Symbolic Language: Communication that uses something (e.g. a word, sign, picture, etc.) to represent a concept or meaning. For example,sounds symbolize meaning in our speech while letters and words represent meaning in our writing, and in AAC we use symbols you can hear, see or feel. Symbolic language permits us to talk beyond the "here and now" about things in another time or place. In contrast, non-symbolic communication is limited to the "here and now," for example, using pointing and gestures to respond to what one sees, hears or feels in the immediate environment.
Tactile finger spelling: The use of touch while finger spelling; it is often used with individuals who have visual impairments in addition to hearing impairments
Tangible or tactile symbols: Symbols that can be discriminated based on the use of touch such as shape, texture, consistency (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Text-to-speech output: Speech produced when a computer translates the letter of the text into sounds, using a complex set of pronunciation rules (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Three-dimensional representations ("tangible" symbols): Symbols that can be discriminated based on shape, texture, consistency (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Tonic Neck Reflex: "The arm toward which the infant is facing extends straight away from the body with the hand partially open, while the arm on the side away from the face is flexed and the fist is clenched tightly. Reversing the direction in which the face is turned reverses the position." [Source and more information at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003292.htm]
Two-dimensional representations (symbols): Flat symbols (e.g. photographs, line drawings, etc.)
Unaided techniques: Methods of communication that require nothing external to the body to represent meaning e.g. signing, gestures, vocalizations, etc. (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Visual output: Output for the communication partner that is seen rather than heard; e.g. visual display or printout
Vocabulary capacity: Many devices come with a large vocabulary or symbol dictionary. This total capacity should not be confused with the size of the vocabulary that can be available to the user during communication. For example, the DynaVox with Gateway vocabulary has thousands of words in its dictionary, but few users can utilize more than several hundred of them during conversation.
Vocabulary or messages: The concepts that are available for the AAC user to communicate. This is different from the "vocabulary capacity" of a device, see above.
Vocalizations: Sounds made with the voice that are not speech sounds. The can be involuntary (yawning, laughing, sneezing) or voluntary (cry, moan, yell). (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)
Voice activated switch: An electronic switch that is turned on by sound. Able-bodied consumers see this type of switch in the lights that turn on when you clap hands. These switches can be modified to activate with particular frequencies of sounds, for example humming, and screen out other sounds, for example coughing.
Voice Output Communication Aid (VOCA): The original term used to describe communication devices with speech output. These are now more commonly called "Speech Generating Devices (SGD).
Voice (or Speech) output: Many communication devices convey information to the partner with audible sound. There are two types of voice/speech output: digitized and text-to-speech (or synthesized).
Volitional movements: Actions of the body that are intentional and under control. This is in contrast to non-volitional movements such as spasms, twitches, etc.
Word-pattern prediction: This speed enhancement method predicts words as the text is being produced, based on the grammatical rules of the words that have preceded it (Beukelman & Mirenda, 1998)


Alphabet Board


Resource Toolkit Assignment:  Resource Summary Sheet

1.     Name of the tool, or a brief description: Alphabet board

2.     What type of patient(s) would you use this tool/technique with?  (Describe by characteristics or by etiology.) This tool is appropriate for a verbal independent communicator looking for a low-tech AAC tool. Specifically, alphabet boards may be especially helpful for clients with certain types of dysarthria or impairments that affect clear articulation as a means of clarifying speech. This alphabet board is not appropriate for nonverbal clients, even if they are independent communicators. Clients who need a method to help them slow down their rate of speech may also benefit from using an alphabet board to point to the first letter of each word.

3.     How/why would you use this tool?  In what way will it be helpful? I would teach clients and their communication partner(s) how to use the alphabet board as a clarification tool when the client is speaking. In a pinch, clients could also use the board to quickly spell a word or answer yes or no. I also would plan to use this board as one method of checking a client’s spelling ability (especially if they are not able to write or type).

4.     What are the advantages of this tool/technique? I purposely left some of the spaces on the board blank so that clients and their communication partners would have space to add additional words/phrases that are important to them during communication. The alphabet board is easy to use, does not require complex set-up or charging, is not expensive, and can be quickly taught to lots of communication partners.

5.     Are there any disadvantages to this tool/technique? Using the alphabet board may not always clarify unclear speech. Additionally, it can be a slow process, which can frustrate clients. There are limited options for functional words/phrases to added to the board, so the client is highly limited in the number of whole words or utterances they can point to.

The next several questions relate to how you obtained this resource:
6.     If you designed the tool yourself, answer these two questions:
a)     Where did you get the idea for this tool? We have discussed the use and importance of alphabet boards in a number of classes, and it’s a great tool to have on hand when working with clients who need an AAC method to clarify speech or reduce rate of speech.

b)    Anything you still don’t like about it and might change in the future? Although I could have filled in the empty boxes with all of my own words, characters, and utterances, I feel that the board is more powerful and useful if the client and his/her communication partner(s) have the opportunity to individualize the board a bit. With this being said, I would not change it.




A
B
C
D
E
F
G

Space
?
H
I
J
K
L
M
N

Delete
!
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U

Yes
No
V
W
X
Y
Z





0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9